Workshop at the Faculty of Law at UiT Explores Challenges in Combating Human Trafficking
06.02.2024
Exploring Digital Evidence Collection During Armed Conflicts
05.10.2023
Exploring Legal Hermeneutics and Technology: Two Upcoming Events You Don't Want to Miss!
Workshop at the Faculty of Law at UiT Explores Challenges in Combating Human Trafficking
On March 24th and 25th, the research group on Crime Control and Security Law (CCSL) hosted a workshop on the persistent challenges posed by human trafficking. The event gathered national and international experts and scholars to exchange ideas on combating this severe human rights violation, discussing possible legal frameworks, detection methods, and prosecution strategies.
The workshop highlighted the complexity of human trafficking, a crime that often involves transnational organized criminal networks and has become increasingly difficult to address due to its clandestine nature and digital dimension. A multitude of different froms of trafficking were covered, ranging from forced labor and sexual exploitation to illegal adoptions and trafficking of human remains.
Dean of the Faculty of Law, Tore Henriksen, opened the event by emphasizing the relevance and gravity of the topic. Nathalie Ottosson, PhD candidate at UiT and main organizer of the workshop, introduced the theme with her presentation on the intersection of European and international criminal law, exploring how these legal frameworks work together to address human trafficking.
One highlight of the workshop was the keynote lecture by Hans-Jörg Albrecht from Germany, who provided a critical perspective on human trafficking. Following the keynote, a series of empirical presentations offered insights into the global scope of trafficking. Aleksandar Maršavelski presented on human trafficking in Croatia, and Liling Yue on human trafficking in China. They presented data on the demographics of offenders and victims, and the evolving challenges faced by law enforcement agencies.
The workshop also explored less commonly discussed aspects of human trafficking, such as trafficking at sea.
Jessica Schechinger and Youri van Logchem examined the forced labor that takes place on fishing vessels, while Eva van der Marel highlighted the link between illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing and human trafficking.
Further into the workshop, discussions turned to innovative approaches to tackling human trafficking. Nandor Knust and Michael Riegler presented on the use of satellite imagery and artificial intelligence to advance transnational crime control.
Another fascinating contribution came from Gor Samvel, who discussed the normative order of radical environmental movements and their intersection with human trafficking, particularly in the context of wildlife trafficking and the trafficking of human remains for medical and spiritual purposes. Gaiane Nuridzhanian presented on "The Principle of Ne Bis in Idem and Transnational Crime," discussing how this legal principle —ensuring that no one is tried twice for the same crime— applies to cross-border offenses, including human trafficking. She examined the challenges of enforcing this principle in transnational cases and its implications for international cooperation in criminal justice.
To end the workshop, criminologist John Winterdyk from Canada addressed "The Use of Social Networking Technology to Reduce the Demand for Commercial Sex/Sex Trafficking." His presentation focused on how digital tools and online platforms can be leveraged to shift perceptions, discourage demand, and combat human trafficking.
The event provided a platform for scholars and practitioners to share expertise and discuss potential solutions. The relaxed and collaborative atmosphere allowed participants to engage in meaningful exchanges of ideas and establish connections for future research. The workshop emphasized the urgent need for global cooperation and innovative solutions to combat human trafficking, with experts from diverse fields coming together to explore ways forward in tackling this pressing issue.
Exploring Digital Evidence Collection During Armed Conflicts
On 22-24 January, the research group on Crime Control and Security Law (CCSL) conducted an International Seminar on 'Collecting Digital Evidence during Armed Conflicts' at UiT-The Arctic University of Norway.
Exploring Legal Hermeneutics and Technology: Two Upcoming Events You Don't Want to Miss!
On October 9th and 10th, we are hosting a masterclass and an interdisciplinary workshop in collaboration with the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law.
To attend any or both of the events please registerby sending an e-mail tonandor.knust@uit.no.
October 9th: Masterclass - What does it mean to apply the law? Insights from Legal Hermeneutics
Featuring Ralf Poscher from the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security, and Law.
Applying the law is a practice which encompasses a variety of different analytical instruments. Most of these distinctions are deeply rooted not just in the legal methodological but also in the doctrinal and even institutional tradition. Likewise, and contrary to monistic accounts, hermeneutics is a set of distinct practices that are of variable relevance for different hermeneutical situations. It follows that when a lawyer applies the law to a given case, they will rely on a diverse range of hermeneutical activities. The complexity of legal hermeneutics is linked to the complexity of legal contexts, like legal interpretation, rule-following, legal construction, association, the exercise of discretion, and judgments on the significance of a legal provision. By highlighting how all of these distinct practices are linked to particular debates in analytic philosophy, this workshop seeks to shed light on a question that is vital to all lawyers: What does it mean to apply the law?
October 10th:Interdisciplinary Workshop - Modern Technologies and Self-Determination
Big data promises to radically expand our cognitive reach, allowing us to collect and process data and thus to generate knowledge on a scale we have never done before. This creates, according to a commonly held belief, an abundance of opportunities for furthering human agency such as more efficient policing, better protection of the environment, or a more targeted delivery of state services. It also, however, challenges a set of commonly held values of our legal orders. As we introduce automation into them, some of the values we hold dear may forever be transformed or even eroded.
This is why, in our workshop, by embarking on an interdisciplinary research endeavor, we want to assess how our legal societies can reap the benefits of modern technologies while still maintaining human self-determination. We do so by exploring challenges for legal concepts which are typically regarded as emanations of human self-determination, such as data protection, the transparency and explainability of legal decisions or the connectedness of legal processes to human communication
This exploration is clustered into three thematic sessions the diversity of which reflects both the fundamental ambivalence and discipline-transcending impact of technological progress. In a first session, scholars from the legal and philosophical disciplines will analyze how such technological innovations could pose a challenge for human self-determination. In a second session, computer scientists will presenting some of the technological innovations which could transform our field. The third session forms the synthesis of the first two. In it, we will discuss specific projects which aim at reaping AI’s promise while at the same time reigning in its peril.
The research group on crime control and security law focuses on different judicial, quasi-judicial and non-judicial instruments of crime control on the national, regional and international level. The group aims at debating the relationship between fundamental personal freedoms and security in the light of change of the landscape of our social co-existence and recent developments in criminal justice and the security law architecture.
International and national armed conflicts, mass violence, terrorism, organised crime, large-scale environmental crimes, etc. are a permanent threat to mankind and the entire planet. One way to respond to these threats is the creation of criminal responsibility for individuals (and corporations). Typically, criminal law is considered the manifestation of the ultima ratio application of the monopoly of power by national states. But in a globalised world and the transnational crime associated with it, criminal law leaves the strict boundaries of the national state and its territory aside to form a new subcategory of law: International Criminal Law. The examination, the deeper understanding, and the application of this legal subsystem are the primary goals//objectives of this course. To generate a better understanding of the functions and the logic of this system of international criminal law and how it interacts with other legal and non-legal systems (such as truth commissions, customary procedures, etc.), this course is divided into three main parts:
1. General concepts of international criminal law: Four categories
2. ‘Atrocity crimes’: International Criminal Law strictu sensu
3. Transitional Justice: Plurality of legal, quasi-legal, and non-legal responses to mass violence and large-scale conflicts.
Bjørn Aslak Juliussen, Jon Petter Rui og Dag Johansen
Algorithms that forget: Machine unlearning and the right to erasure. Computer Law and Security Review 2023
Bjørn Aslak Juliussen, Elisavet Kozyri, Dag Johansen og Jon Petter Rui
The third country problem under the GDPR: enhancing protection of data transfers with technology. International Data Privacy Law (IDPL) 2023
Stine-Karethe Jensen. Skillet mellom tilleggsskatt og straff for skattesvik. Skatterett 2023/3, page 223-243
Nandor Knust & Emmanouil Billis. Principle of Proportionality. In: Elgar Encyclopedia of Crime and Criminal Justice. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN: 9781789902983.
Emmanouil Billis, Nandor Knust & Jon Petter Rui. Artificial Intelligence and the principle of proportionality (Künstliche Intelligenz und der Grundsatz der Verhältnismäßigke). In: Digitalisierung, Globalisierung und Risikoprävention. Duncker & Humblot. ISBN: 9783428559718
2022
Martin Hennig. Ulovlig påvirkningsvirksomhet i samarbeid med fremmed etterretningstjeneste. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskap 2021 (3), s. 434-451.
Artem Galushko.A Union or, rather, a Dis-Union of Nations? Legacies of Soviet “Nationality Policies” and their Influence on Law and Practice in the Post-Soviet States. In: State-Building, Rule of Law, Good Governance and Human Rights in Post-Soviet Space. Routledge 2022 ISBN: 9781003198024
2021
Rui, Jon Petter; Knust, Nandor Knust & Emmanouil Billis. The Typology of Proportionality. In: Proportionality in Crime Control and Criminal Justice. Hart Publishing Ltd 2021 ISBN 9781509938605. s.3-28 UiB UiT
2020
Jon Petter Rui. Fra menneskerettighetsdomstolen. Unntak fra bevisumiddelbarhetsprinsippet ved opplesing av vitneforklaring under hovedforklaring avgitt av vitne som møter, men ikke vil forklare seg. Tidsskrift for strafferett 2020 s.92-99 UiT
2019
Jon Petter Rui & Tina Søreide. Governments' Enforcement of Corporate Bribery Laws: A Call for a Two-Track Regulatory Regime. Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap 2019 ;Volum 132.(2) s.132-162 NHH UiT